DemandHunt Demand signals from global communities
EN
Dev Tools & Micro-SaaS Hacker News · 2022-05-25

Why is there no enterprise-grade open-source Zoom alternative?

企业级、可私有化的 Zoom 开源替代到底存不存在?

At a glance · 30-second read
  • WhoHacker News · 2022-05-25 · 41 upvotes · 34 replies
  • The askWhy is there no enterprise-grade open-source Zoom alternative?
  • The openingAn enterprise wrapper over LiveKit/Jitsi: recording archive, watermarks, SSO, managed ops.

What was actually said

“They like to self-host everything, and are wary of using outside services… We've set up Jitsi.”

— Hacker News · 2022-05-25 · news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31504008…

Background and pain

The pain

Regulated buyers need self-hosting, yet open-source options fall short on reliability, recording and scale.

A buildable angle

The opening

An enterprise wrapper over LiveKit/Jitsi: recording archive, watermarks, SSO, managed ops.

How to validate it

  1. Read the whole thread and note the recurring scenarios — repetition is the density of the need.
  2. Search existing tools around "video calls / self-hosted" and check which single step they actually cover.
  3. Put up a one-line landing page, share it back to Hacker News, and see whether anyone asks about pricing.

Existing options

Jitsi, LiveKit, BigBlueButton

From the thread · top comments

I'd point to this related question. "Chat" services of various kinds have been around on the internet since the 1990s, the one thing that they all have in common is that they burn out. For instance there was CUSeeMe, Paltalk, Tivejo, AOL Instant Messenger, ICQ, Skype, WebEx, Facebook Messenger, and many others. Google alone has made 11. Some of them are still around, but there's a general pattern that a company does the work to create an application but doesn't do the work to keep it up. Then some new thing comes along, gets popular for a while, then deteriorates. Unless Zoom breaks the patter

— PaulHoule

What you are looking for is BigBlueButton: https://bigbluebutton.org/ It is targetting the virtual classroom market but it does general videoconferencing just right.

— prmoustache

Sorry, I must be a luddite. I don't get the video conferencing craze. In most cases, I see little real, added value in a live video feed. What I find more generally useful is simple desktop/screen sharing with audio (i.e. GotoMeeting, TeamViewer) If you must see the participants, allow a photo/avatar. Watching real lips moving in a stuttered video is quite chic and nouveau and all ... it's nice with family ... but it doesn't really add much value in a typical business setting IMO. As with most things, there are exceptions but I use desktop sharing way more often.

— jqpabc123
Open the source thread

More threads on this pain

Related opportunities